Legal Opinion

F. Tru. Sav. Bk. v. U.S. Fid. Guar. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1924No. 24,176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 200 N.W. 848. This controversy has been here before and there is no use of going over again the ground covered by the first opinion, which is reported in 156 Minn. 231, 194 N.W. 376. As a result of the appeal the case was remanded with directions to vacate the money judgment in favor of plaintiff, and permit the defendant to answer. Upon the return of the case to the district court there were had the proceedings now under review.

On July 16, 1923, the administrator, Leak, petitioned the probate court for an order clarifying its order of June 23, 1922 (which on the former appeal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Neumann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Village of Buhl v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Zaske v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plunkett v. First National Bank of AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. In Re Estate of FirleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API