Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Zaske v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 1900No. Nos. 11,981-(224)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Writ of certiorari issued out of the supreme court to review an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., in bastardy proceedings.

1Per curiam

The facts in this ease are stated in the opinion in the case of State v. Matter, 78 Minn. 377, 81 N. W. 9, in which it was held that the relator could not review the order of the district court complained of on habeas corpus. Thereupon he sued out the writ of certiorari in this case. On the return of the writ the respondent moved to quash it, for the reason that the order was appealable, and therefore certiorari would not lie to review it.

*28The uniform doctrine of this court is that the writ of certiorari will not lie, except in special and extraordinary cases, where there is or has been an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Zaske v. MatterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aastad v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. F. Tru. Sav. Bk. v. U.S. Fid. Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API