State ex rel. Village of Buhl v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of the village of Buhl, its trustees and treasurer, the supreme court granted a writ of certiorari to review the order, Cant, jr„ of the district court for St. Louis county, in an action in which the Consumers’ Ore Company was plaintiff and Village of Buhl and others were defendants, commanding defendants to complete and levy an assessment for paving for the year 1914, and certify the same to the auditor of St. Louis county, or show cause why they should…
Read the full summary
Upon the relation of the village of Buhl, its trustees and treasurer, the supreme court granted a writ of certiorari to review the order, Cant, jr„ of the district court for St. Louis county, in an action in which the Consumers’ Ore Company was plaintiff and Village of Buhl and others were defendants, commanding defendants to complete and levy an assessment for paving for the year 1914, and certify the same to the auditor of St. Louis county, or show cause why they should not be punished for contempt of court.
1Per curiam
Certiorari to review proceedings in the district court of St. Louis county. Respondents move to quash the writ.
The relators are the president, recorder, trustees and treasurer of the village of Buhl. In 1914 the Consumers’ Ore Company brought an action against the village and its officers, which resulted in an injunction against doing certain paving, unless a stated percentage of the cost was assessed against property specially benefited. There was no appeal. On November 8, 1916, an order to show cause was issued in said action which, upon hearing, resulted in an order of December 23, 1916,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Neumann v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- F. Tru. Sav. Bk. v. U.S. Fid. Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Warner v. A. G. Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942