Legal Opinion
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. United States of America, Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 3, 2002No. 99-2444PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.
This is an Indian Gaming Regulatory Act case in which the plaintiff tribe, invoking the Administrative Procedure Act as a jurisdictional predicate for its suit, seeks judicial review of Interior Department determinations that allowed the intervenor Indian bands to operate a gambling casino in Northern Michigan. There is a threshold question as to whether the plaintiff has standing to sue.
In summary judgment proceedings that straddled a remand from this court, the district court determined (a) that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- TOMAC v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- City of Cleveland v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Airline Professionals Association of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 1224, Afl-Cio v. Airborne, Inc., Abx Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- City of Roseville v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.