Legal Opinion

Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis Railroad v. Daughtry

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 2, 1891No. 1361PublishedCited by 113 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. Motion to dismiss or affirm. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

This was an action commenced in the Circuit Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, by R. S. Daughtry as administrator of John W. Daughtry, deceased, against the Kansas City, Fort Scott and Memphis Railroad Company and the Kansas City, Memphis and Birmingham Railroad Company on the 16th of August, 1888, for the recovery of damages for the death of John-W. Daughtry, alleged to have been occasioned by .the negligence of defendants. The summons was returnable on the third Monday of September, 1888, and alleged as to the defendants, “both of which are railroad corporations conducting business in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crehore v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WangelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Carson v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893
  4. Guarantee Co. of North Dakota v. HanwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  5. Crisp v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API