Legal Opinion
In Re Weisbard
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 29, 2001No. 00SA283PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The issue that this attorney regulation case presents is whether the presiding disciplinary judge (PDJ) applied the correct standard in deciding whether to vacate a default entered against an attorney-respondent. When the respondent, Robert J. Weisbard, did not answer the complaint filed against him, the PDJ entered a default on September 22, 1999. The allegations of the complaint were therefore deemed admitted. See C.R.C.P. 251.15(b).
Weisbard appeared pro se at his sanctions hearing on January 18, 2000, and presented argument and evidence regarding the form of discipline to be imposed. See…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First National Bank of Telluride v. FleisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Tyler v. Adams County Department of Social Services Ex Rel. TylerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Sumler v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Hines Highlands Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment v. CaulkColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by17 opinions
- Goodman Associates, LLC v. WP Mountain Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Borer v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Hytken v. WakeColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Singh v. MortensunColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Taylor v. LongColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.