Legal Opinion
Sumler v. District Court, City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 30, 1995No. 94SA193PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This is an original proceeding in the nature of mandamus, pursuant to C.A.R. 21, which seeks to reinstate a default judgment obtained by the plaintiff, Steve C. Sumler, against the defendant, Camp Coast to Coast, Inc., and to vacate an order for a trial on the merits. 1 We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge the rule.
I
In September 1992, the plaintiff brought a civil action for damages against the defendant for wrongful termination of employment in the District Court for the City and County of Denver. 2 Both parties were represented by counsel. The case was assigned to Denver…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kempter v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Kwik Way Stores, Inc. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Craig v. RiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Buckmiller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Lemons v. Superior Court of Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Goodman Associates, LLC v. WP Mountain Properties, LLCSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- Borer v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Bailey v. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Dunton v. Whitewater West Recreation, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re WeisbardSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.