Legal Opinion
Hytken v. Wake
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 2002No. 01CA2107PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROY.
Plaintiffs, Kent Hytken; Future Residential, LLC; Hytken Partnership I, LLC; and Hytken Partnership, LLC, appeal from a trial court judgment dismissing their action against defendants, Daniel F. Wake; J.S. Horowitz; Krendl, Horowitz & Krendl}; Horowitz & Wake; James J. Peters; Christopher L. Tureson; Riggs, Abney, Neal, Tur-pen, Orbison & Lewis; and Vransec, Peters & McBride, P.C. Plaintiffs also appeal the order denying their motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
On December 29, 2000, plaintiffs, none of whom is a Colorado resident, filed legal malpractice and negligence…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- People v. CzemerynskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. 455 Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Slack v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Colorado Department of Labor & Employment v. EsserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Southern Cross Ranches v. JBC Agricultural ManagementColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- R.J.Z. v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Benzing v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- v. AuneColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- Thiele v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.