Legal Opinion

Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc. v. Hines Highlands Ltd. Partnership

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 9, 1996No. 95SA294PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis

The objectors-appellants, Aspen Wilderness Workshop, Inc., Constance Harvey, and Joy and Samuel Caudill (collectively, the appellants), appeal from an order of the District Court, Water Division 5 (water court) granting the applieants-appellees’, Hines Highlands Limited Partnership and Aspen Highlands Mountain Limited Liability Company (collectively, Highlands), application for a conditional water decree. We conclude that the water court did not err in granting the conditional decree and that it correctly denied the appellants’ request for attorney fees and costs. Accordingly, we affirm the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. MiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Fellhauer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  5. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. Dallas Creek Water Co. v. HueySupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Williams v. Midway Ranches Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Consolidated Mutual Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Empire Lodge Homeowners' Ass'n v. MoyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API