Legal Opinion

Susan Strouss v. Michigan Department of Corrections, a State Agency and Body Politic Marie Fletcher Gerald Devoss, in Their Individual Capacities

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 4, 2001No. 99-2501PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Susan Strouss (“Strouss”) appeals from the district court’s grant of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The district court dismissed Strouss’ Title VII claim alleging constructive discharge in retaliation for opposing sexual harassment. The district court also dismissed Strouss’ Section 1983 claims brought against the two individual defendants alleging violations of her due process and Fust Amendment rights. For the reasons provided below, we AFFIRM the district court’s decision.

I. BACKGROUND

Susan Strouss is a former nurse…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Betty Weigel v. Baptist Hospital of East TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  2. Donald Abbott v. Crown Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Farhat v. JopkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Richard Tisdale v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. Farhat v. JopkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API