Legal Opinion
Reich v. King
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 17, 1994No. Civ. A. WN-92-2116PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Secretary of Labor’s and Defendants’ Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 39, The Secretary’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Paper No. 40, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment), and Defendants’ Request for an Advisory Jury (Paper No. 34). All motions are opposed. Upon a review of the pleadings and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6), and all motions will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The Secretary of Labor has brought this action under the Employee Retirement…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marshall v. Glass/Metal Ass'n & Glaziers & Glassworkers Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
- Lanka v. O'HIGGINSDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liss v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Meyer v. Berkshire Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- DiFelice v. US Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Reich v. KingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Hunt v. Alliance North American Government Income Trust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.