Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Glass/Metal Ass'n & Glaziers & Glassworkers Pension Plan
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided December 18, 1980No. Civ. A. No. 80-0327PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
KING, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ray Marshall, the Secretary of Labor, brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., against the Glass/Metal Association and Glaziers and Glassworkers Pension Plan (“Glaziers Pension Plan” or “Plan”) and the individual trustees of the Plan. Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges that the individual defendants have breached their fiduciary duties under ERISA by committing the Plan to lend 23% of its assets to a company which intends to develop a time sharing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eaves v. PennCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley BankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1979
- John L. Connolly, Etc. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Hawaii Psychiatric Society, District Branch of the American Psychiatric Ass'n v. AriyoshiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. MazzolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Liss v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- DeBruyne v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.