Legal Opinion

Haugland v. City of Bismarck

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2014No. 20130100PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Erling “Curly” Haugland appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his action against the City of Bismarck for declaratory relief involving Bismarck’s implementation of an urban renewal plan and *842use of tax increment financing to fund renewal projects in its renewal area. In Haugland v. City of Bismarck, 2012 ND 123, ¶¶ 55, 64, 818 N.W.2d 660, we remanded for further proceedings to resolve: (1) whether Bismarck adopted an appropriate resolution in 1994 to add six city blocks to its renewal area; and (2) whether Bismarck had any pending authorized renewal projects in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Wenco v. EOG Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Coulter v. RambergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christianson v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Hewitt v. NDDOTNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Haugland v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API