Legal Opinion

Haugland v. City of Bismarck

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2014No. 20130100Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/14/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2014 ND 51

Erling “Curly” Haugland, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

City of Bismarck, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20130100

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donovan John Foughty, Judge.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

Opinion of the Court by Crothers, Justice.

Monte L. Rogneby (argued) and Amanda E. Peterson (on brief), P.O. Box 2097, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2097, for plaintiff and appellant.

Randall J. Bakke, P.O. Box 460, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-0460,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Hamilton v. WollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API