Legal Opinion

State v. Carman

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1988No. 16344PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

James Carman was convicted by a jury of committing forcible rape. The district court sentenced Carman to a ten-year indeterminate term. Carman appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the final order denying his I.C.R. 35 motion to reduce the sentence. The issues on appeal are whether the district court abused its discretion in not granting a continuance of the trial date so Carman could substitute private counsel of his choice for court-appointed counsel, and whether the court abused its discretion in denying Carman’s Rule 35 motion. For reasons explained below, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PrattIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RansomIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. PriestIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. LippertIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. PeckIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API