Legal Opinion

State v. Ransom

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1993No. 19370PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Judge.

Appellant, Steven Dean Ransom, appeals from convictions for unlawful lewd conduct (I.C. § 18-1508) with a minor under sixteen years of age and for sexual abuse of another child (I.C. § 18-1506). Ransom contends that: 1) the trial court should not have denied his motion for a continuance, 2) a videotaped interview with one of the victims should not have been admitted, 3) certain expert testimony should not have been admitted, and 4) the trial court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence, and assigns error to each of those rulings. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. LankfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. EllingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. LovelaceIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. FieldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. TapiaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Vendelin v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API