Legal Opinion

Ripper v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1910No. 2,868PublishedCited by 40 opinions

In Error to the District Court oí the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. John A. Ripper was convicted of violating the Oleomargarine Act, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HOOK, Circuit Judge.

John A. Ripper was convicted of violations of Act Aug. 2, 1886, c. 840, 24 Stat. 209 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2228), commonly known as the “Oleomargarine Act.” The indictment contained two counts. The sentence under the first was a fine oí $50 and imprisonment for six months, and under the second a fine of 8250 and imprisonment for six months. The terms of imprisonment were concurrent. By the first count, which was framed under section 13 of the act, the accused was charged with having in his possession an empty package which had theretofore contained colored…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. McCray v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Veazie Bank v. FennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Treat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. BorkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1920
  3. Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  4. United States v. SlusserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1921
  5. Sparks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API