Tezino v. State

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of the offense of injury to a child. Following a pre-sentence investigation, the court assessed punishment at 25 years confinement. Appellant asserts nine points of error.

By his first point of error, appellant urges that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction for injury to a child because there is little evidence, if any, tending to disprove his claim that the child was injured during a car accident, and no evidence showing that the child’s injuries were caused by appellant’s commission of a criminal act.

The offense of…