Orrick v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Terry Eugene Orrick appeals from his conviction for driving while intoxicated. In one point on appeal, Appellant contends that the admission of an unopened bottle of vodka as demonstrative evidence at Appellant’s trial constituted reversible error under rules 401, 402, and 403 of the Texas Rules of Evidence. We affirm.
II. Factual BACKGROUND
At around 11:00 p.m. on December 17, 1996, Officers B.E. Ladd and J.R. Thompson of the Fort Worth Police Department clocked Appellant’s car traveling at 54 m.p.h. in a 35 m.p.h. zone. After they followed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Onwukwe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Darrell Lynn Holleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
- Felix Onwukwe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Mario Anthony Gomez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
- Richard Charles Riette v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015