Legal Opinion

Flournoy v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1984No. 597-83PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TEAGUE, Judge.

The State, through the petition for discretionary review that was filed by a member of the staff of the Hon. Tim Curry, District Attorney of Tarrant County, challenges the correctness of the holding that the Fort Worth Court of Appeals made in Flournoy v. State, 650 S.W.2d 526 (Tex.App.1983), which was that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the attempted burglary of a habitation conviction of Keith Wayne Flournoy, who is the appellant in this cause. We agree with the State that the evidence is sufficient to sustain…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Sewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. McCravy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Hines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Thornton, GregoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Chavez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Stahle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
  5. Simms v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API