Legal Opinion

Verhoff v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 13, 2006No. 3:05CV7277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a suit by Dennis Verhoff, against his former employer, Time Warner Cable, Inc. (“Time Warner”). Plaintiff, who suffers from severe eczema, a chronic skin condition, claims that Time Warner violated federal and state law by not accommodating his condition and by retaliating against him for asserting his rights. He claims that Time Warner violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq.; an equivalent state statute, O.R.C. § 4112.99; and the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., through both interference with…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Henry Dicarlo v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Robert N. Colwell, Charles R. Ellinger and Richard H. Abrams, Jr. v. Suffolk County Police Department, County of SuffolkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. Terry D. Walton v. Ford Motor Company Visteon Corporation, Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Santiago v. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
  2. Gillman v. Okaloosa County FloridaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2014
  3. Baker v. Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical CenterDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Beal v. Chicago Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  5. Comerica Bank v. SchnizleinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API