Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Department of Transportation

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 25, 2014No. Civil No. 3:12cv132 (JBA)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Samuel Santiago, an employee of the Connecticut Department of Transportation (“DOT”), alleges that Defendants, employees of the DOT, interfered with his rights by denying him leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and retaliated against him for exercising his rights under the FMLA by placing him on unpaid leave.2 Both sides have moved for summary judgment with Defendants moving [Doc. # 79] for judgment on all counts and Plaintiff moving [Doc. #80] for judgment on Count One (FMLA…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Holcomb v. Iona CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Coleman v. Court of Appeals of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Graziadio v. Culinary Institute of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  2. DeAngelo v. Yellowbook Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  3. Smith v. N. Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Sys.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  4. Mendillo v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  5. Macintyre v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API