Legal Opinion
Maverick Tube Corp. v. Toscelik Profil Ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 3, 2017No. 2016-2330PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
Appellants, Toscelik Profíl ve Sac En-düstrisi A.S., and Qayirova Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, “Qayirova”), appeal from the final judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (“Trade Court”) sustaining Commerce’s decision that Qayirova is not entitled to a duty drawback adjustment for its exports of oil country tubular goods. 1 See Maverick Tube Corp. v. United States, 163 F.Supp.3d 1345 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2016). Because Commerce properly interpreted and applied the Tariff Act to deny Qayirova’s duty drawback adjustment, we affirm.
I
A
This case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Pesquera Mares Australes Ltda. v. United States v. Coalition for Fair Atlantic Salmon TradeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Saha Thai Steel Pipe (Public) Co. Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Eregli Demir Ve Celik Fabrikalari T.A.S v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Aristocraft of America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2017
- Goodluck India Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.