Legal Opinion

Reed v. McRill

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1894No. 5296PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Valley county. Tried below before Harrison, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

McRill sued the plaintiffs in error, alleging that in the months of July, August, and September, 1890, McRill was the owner and in possession of three-fourths of all the grass and hay then .standing and growing on a certain quarter section of land described in the petition; that said hay was seventy-five tons and of the value of $600; that the plaintiffs in error, against the will and consent of McRill, cut down and converted to their own use all of such grass and hay. There was a verdict and judgment for McRill, from which error is prosecuted.

The assignments of error are quite…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Alwood v. RuckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Fiquet v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Warner v. AbbeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Johnson v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. American Fire Insurance v. LandfareNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Maxson v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. BrennauerNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Charles Eneu Johnson Co. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. McGrew Machine Co. v. One Spring Alarm Clock Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API