Legal Opinion

Dari-Delite, Inc. v. Cleckner

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 3, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 31090PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By WEICK, District Judge.

The complaint is labelled “Complaint for Breach of Contract.” It sets forth a claim for damages for the alleged failure of the defendants to pay royalties provided under a written contract for the use of ice cream freezer machines.

Jurisdiction of this court is based on diversity of citizenship.

The case was tried by the court without a jury.

Dari-Delite, Inc., an Illinois corporation, was made an involuntary plaintiff by the court under the provisions of Rule 19(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U. S. C. A.

A written contract was entered into between…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Coward v. ClantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. San Pedro Lumber Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Elliott v. Murphy Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Quinn v. State Ex Rel. LeroyOhio Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eugene Cole and Mary Cole, His Wife v. Thomas A. Cardoza, District Director, United States, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  2. Dartron Corp. v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  3. Homer v. LorillardMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API