Legal Opinion

DeSantis v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 29, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action brought by Dominick De-Santis, “for the sole use and benefit of Ernest Bucci,” to recover upon an attachment bond signed by Jacob Friedberg and Leo Dane “as they are trustees of the Codman Park Trust,” as principals, and by the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, as surety. The case was tried to a jury and there was a verdict for the plaintiff. At the trial exceptions were saved by the plaintiff and by the defendants. There are two bills of exceptions before this court, one in behalf of the defendants jointly and one in behalf of the plaintiff, “the latter to be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. WitterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  2. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. O'Gasapian v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Shapiro v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Precious v. O'RourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Boston v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Torrao v. CoxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  3. Geffen v. PaletzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Richmond v. StanzlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Burns Bros. v. BlockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API