Legal Opinion
Geffen v. Paletz
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 9, 1942PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The plaintiff in the first suit, who is the administrator of the estate of Joseph Geffen, hereinafter re*49ferred to as the intestate, seeks to have expunged from the records of the registry of deeds a fraudulent discharge of a $40,000 mortgage that had been assigned to the intestate, and also to have determined the amount due from the defendant Bernard L. Gale, hereinafter referred to as Gale, upon a promissory note. The plaintiff in the second suit is a judgment creditor of Gale, and seeks to reach and apply Gale’s alleged interest in the real estate, hereinafter referred to as the Pearl…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Morin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Barnes v. BoardmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GaleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Culhane v. Aurora Loan ServicesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Shelburne Shirt Co. v. SingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Cooperstein v. BogasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Bouchard v. BouchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.