Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1948No. Appeal, 41PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This is an appeal from the decision of the Superior Court, reversing the judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiff in a negligence action. The single question is whether plaintiff, as a matter of law, was guilty of contributory negligence, justifying the entry of a judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

Reading the testimony in the light most advantageous to the plaintiff, and resolving all conflicts and drawing all reasonable inferences therefrom in his favor, as the court is required to do on a motion for judgment n. o. v. (Scholl, Admrx., v.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcraft v. C. G. Hussey and Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Scholl v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Caulton v. Eyre Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Tatarewicz v. United Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Rea v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DiGriannantonio v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Kurtz v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Guca v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Steffenson v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. McClintock v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API