Legal Opinion

Harnischfeger Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 7, 1936No. 42099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHALEY, Judge.

The plaintiff brings this suit for interest on alleged overpayments of income taxes for the year 1918 and 1919 which it claims were refunded to it. The controversy arises in the following manner:

Prior to and during 1927, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue had under consideration the returns of the plaintiff for the years 1918, 1919, and 1920, and, as a result of his audits, he determined an over-assessment for 1918 of $80,072.44, an over-assessment for 1919 of $1,764.11, and a deficiency for the year 1920 of $100,442.20. On January 13, 1927, a 30-day determination letter was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  2. McCarl v. United States ex rel. LelandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1930
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  4. Tull & Gibbs, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Coast Biscuit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API