Legal Opinion
Bullock v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1937No. 3478PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, District Judge.
This is an action under section 16 of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C.A. § 16) to enforce a reparation order of the Interstate Commerce Commission requiring the defendant to pay the plaintiffs certain alleged unreasonable charges on freight shipments.
The plaintiffs complained to the commission that on nine shipments of petroleum products made during the period from April to November, 1930, freight charges, in excess of the rates prescribed in Porter Oil Company v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 172 I.C.C. 407, decided February 9, 1931, were collected. A hearing was…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963