Legal Opinion
Arrant v. Zambrano
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 15, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01220Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN RAY ARRANT Case No.: 3:20-cv-01220-JLS-AGS CDCR No. K98602, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT vs. UNDER FED. R. CIV. PRO. 59(E) 14 M. ZAMBRANO, et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 17) 16 17 18 19 On June 29, 2020, Plaintiff Melvin Ray Arrant filed a civil action pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a motion 21 for temporary restraining order (“TRO”). ECF Nos. 1–3. On September 9, 2020, the Court 22 granted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Zimmerman v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Murray W. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Cross-Appellants, and Sam Steiger, Deponent, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. Henman R.J. Barncastle Willis Gibson Richard A. Stacy Leland Pico Dale BerndtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Stevo Design, Inc. v. SBR Marketing Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013