Legal Opinion

State Investment Co. v. Pacific Employers Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1958No. 40,994PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The question presented is whether a district court, having previously denied plaintiffs motion for a new trial following the entry of judgment for the defendant in a prior term of court, may subsequently, but within the same term in which it entered its order overruling the motion for a new trial, vacate and set aside that order and grant a new trial without notice to the parties affording them an opportunity to appear and be heard.

In view of the conclusions hereafter announced, the question is answered in the affirmative.

State Investment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Rasing v. HealzerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Burnham v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Sylvester v. RieboltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Federal Land Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Triple "D" Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. King v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Daniels v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  4. Dimit v. BradshawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. McClay v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API