Brown v. Triple "D" Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
The ultimate question we are called upon to decide is whether Larry W. Brown should have been permitted to have his action against K. N.-Fitzpatrick reinstated almost two years and four months after it was ordered dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. The order reinstating the action was made ex parte and without the defendant Fitzpatrick having an opportunity to oppose the reinstatement.
A motion to set aside the ex parte order was filed and argued but the trial judge refused to set aside his order of reinstatement. He…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sophie Radack and Charles Radack v. Norwegian America Line Agency, Inc., and Den Norske Amerikalinje, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- L. P. Steuart, Inc. v. Joseph H. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Bucy v. Nevada Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Connell v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Wertz v. Southern Cloud Unified School District 334Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wiechman v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State Ex Rel. Stephan v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Asset Acceptance, LLC v. MoberlyKentucky Supreme Court · 2007
- Beebe v. ChavezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Daniels v. ChaffeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.