Legal Opinion

Zeidler v. Prueher

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1926No. 12,622PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

Appellant Zeidler, hereinafter designated appellant, was a florist. He had no other business or occupation. Besides the real estate used in conducting his business, appellant and his wife owned five dwelling houses which they rented. One of the rentals having been damaged by fire, appellee, who was a carpenter, was employed to repair the roof. The work was such as would require the services of appellee for approximately five hours. While making the repairs, appellee fell from the roof and was injured. For a period of fifteen years prior to the accident, appellee had done occasional jobs of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaynor's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Blood v. Industrial Accident Commission of State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Bailey v. HumrickhouseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Makeever v. MarlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Scott v. RhoadsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Coffin v. HookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Mason v. WamplerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Herthoge v. BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API