Makeever v. Marlin
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKime, J.
The facts as shown by the evidence are substantially as follows: Appellant Makeever was the owner of several farms, but resided in town. The windmill on one farm being damaged, Makeever contracted by telephone with appellant Biggs, a plumber and windmill repairman, to install a new millhead for $55. Biggs had installed several other heads on mills of Makeever at the same price. Nothing was said as to whether Biggs would do the work himself or send some of his employees to do it. No instructions were given Biggs or his employees. Neither Makeever nor any agent of his was present when the work…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- In re BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Dowery v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- Marion Malleable Iron Works v. BaldwinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Heffner v. WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Heffner v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Blew v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Oliver v. ErnstNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Hahn v. GrimmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.