Legal Opinion

Wortham v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1980No. 4741PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

Floyd Wortham was tried on counts charging him with blackmail of Katherine Owings and unlawful sale of a narcotic drug, cocaine. When the jury indicated that it had reached agreement on the drug count but could not agree on the blackmail count, the state agreed to dismissal of the latter charge. Wortham appeals his conviction for unlawful sale of cocaine. His principal arguments on appeal are that the trial court erred in receiving evidence that the residence of Katherine Owings, who was a witness for the prosecution, was ransacked before Wortham’s trial, and erred…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Newsom v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ladd v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stumpf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  2. Wortham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Wortham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  4. Wortham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  5. Stumpf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API