Newsom v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem.
Newsom was convicted of rape. On this appeal he raises the following points: (1) that the grand jury indictment was invalid because based on insufficient evidence; (2) that it was prejudicial error for the trial court to allow the admission into evidence of the contents of a laundry bag Newsom had in his possession at the time of the alleged rape; and (3) that the sentence of imprisonment of 15 years imposed by the court was excessive.
The Grand Jury Indictment.
Three witnesses appeared before the grand jury. Embry, a Loomis Security Guard, making his rounds late…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Davenport v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.