Legal Opinion

Newsom v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1975No. 2189PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem.

Newsom was convicted of rape. On this appeal he raises the following points: (1) that the grand jury indictment was invalid because based on insufficient evidence; (2) that it was prejudicial error for the trial court to allow the admission into evidence of the contents of a laundry bag Newsom had in his possession at the time of the alleged rape; and (3) that the sentence of imprisonment of 15 years imposed by the court was excessive.

The Grand Jury Indictment.

Three witnesses appeared before the grand jury. Embry, a Loomis Security Guard, making his rounds late…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. McClain v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. GolladayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Elson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Coleman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Davenport v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API