Legal Opinion
Wortham v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
Decided February 10, 1983No. 5459PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Floyd Wortham appeals his conviction of two counts of perjury, former AS 11.30.-010(a), following his plea of no contest entered pursuant to an agreement with the court and prosecutor that he could appeal the denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence. The prosecutor specifically stipulated that a ruling to suppress the evidence would terminate the case. Consequently, we have jurisdiction to consider the claim. Oveson v. Municipality of Anchorage, 574 P.2d 801, 803 n. 4 (Alaska 1978); Cooksey v. State, 524 P.2d 1251 (Alaska 1974).
Wortham was tried and convicted of the charge of…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Oveson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Esmailka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
- Wortham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Giel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.