Legal Opinion
McDuffee v. Kelsey
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 1, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is an action against one of the comakers of two promissory notes which were made in New York but were payable in Florida. The action is brought by the payee of one note and the indorsee of the other. At the trial in the Superior Court the judge found that the defendant made the notes, that a payment was made on them as late as January, 1931, within six years before the commencement of the action, and that the plaintiff is a holder in due course for value.
After a finding for the plaintiff, the defendant filed a bill of exceptions, and also claimed an appeal. The judge also reported the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lennon v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Seemann v. EneixMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Forastiere v. Springfield Institution For SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Farmers National Bank of Annapolis v. VennerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Scholl v. GilmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Salvato v. DiSILVA TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Boutillier v. WesingerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Knych v. Trustees of New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Gibbs v. Lido of Worcester, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- Old Colony Bank of Worcester, N. A. v. MillerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.