Austin v. Austin
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.
On appeal in equity from a decree by a single Justice, impressing a trust upon certain real estate in the City of Portland and ordering the defendants to convey it to the plaintiff. That the decree is warranted in law (the necessary facts being *156clearly and indubitably proven) there is no question, for it is well settled in this state that (1) where real estate is conveyed upon the faith of the promise of a grantee to make a will devising it to the grantor and failure to do so would be a fraud, equity raises a constructive trust and declares that the grantee holds the property so impressed.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gilpatrick v. GliddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Whitehouse v. BolsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Grant v. BradstreetSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
- Liberty v. HainesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1907
- Sposedo v. MerrimanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cornwell v. CornwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Hamm v. HammSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Hawkey v. WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
- Nehls v. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959