Whitehouse v. Bolster
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On motion and exceptions by claimant. Action by surety on a probate bond against a co-surety for contribution, begun by trustee process. The issue was between the plaintiff and the claimant, wife of! the defendant. The case appears in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSavage, J.
Action by surety on a probate bond against a co-surety for contribution. The action was commenced by trustee process.
The issue here is between the plaintiff and the wife of the defendant, who is the claimant of the funds in the hands of the several trustees. The funds sought to be held by the trustee process are, in part, certain deposits in bank made by the defendant in the name of his wife, and in part, one-half of the estate of Jennie M. Bolster, daughter of the defendant and claimant, who died intes*460tate and unmarried, leaving her father and her mother as her only-heirs. As to the deposits…
2Cited by27 opinions
- American Surety Co. of NY v. MarottaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Goldberg v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Sheepscot Land Corp. v. GregorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Whipple v. Northern Wyoming Community College Foundation of SheridanWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.