Legal Opinion
Mehta v. Foskey
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided June 29, 2012No. CV 510-001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Gourley, Britt, and Osburn (the “Canine Handlers”). Dkt. No. 38. Also before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Murray and Hewett (the “Alma Officers”). Dkt. No. 44. For the reasons stated below, both motions to dismiss are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
BACKGROUND
When considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must “accept all well-pleaded facts as true.” Solymar Invs., Ltd. v. Banco Santander S.A., 672 F.3d 981, 985 n. 1 (11th Cir.2012). The relevant events in this case began…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roddy v. City of HuntsvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013
- Gilmore v. Georgia Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2020
- Pinto v. Collier CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020