Legal Opinion
Howard-Sloan Legal Search, Inc. v. Todtman, Young, Tunick, Nachamie, Hendler & Spizz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 6, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart C. Cohen, J.), entered July 27, 1992, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing the first and second causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The IAS Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs first cause of action alleging defendant law firm’s breach of an oral agreement to compensate plaintiff for services rendered in effectuating the merger of defendant’s two predecessor firms, and second cause of action for recovery in quantum meruit *405based on such services, on the ground that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Minichiello v. Royal Business Funds Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Hunt Personnel, Ltd. v. Hemingway Transport, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baytree Associates, Inc. v. ForsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Arrow Employment Agency, Inc. v. Tom Rice Buick-Pontiac-GMC Truck Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
- Stavaridis v. Dynamic Machine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1994