Baytree Associates, Inc. v. Forster
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered June 10, 1996, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ *306motions to strike defendants’ jury demand and to limit cross-examination at trial of plaintiffs’ sole principal and denied defendants’ cross-motion, based on the Statute of Frauds, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the cross-motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the complaint.
Summary judgment was appropriate here since plaintiffs failed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Anostario v. VicinanzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mendelson v. FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Chanler v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Haskins v. Loeb Rhoades & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moses v. SavedoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Funding Group, Inc. v. Water Chef, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2008
- Signature Brokerage Inc. v. Group Health Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- I.S. Design, Inc. v. Gasho of Japan, International, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Josephthal Holdings, Inc. v. WeismanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.