Stavaridis v. Dynamic Machine Works, Inc.

The plaintiff, Chris J. Stavaridis (“Stavaridis”), brought this action against the defendant, Dynamic Machine Works, Inc. (“Dynamic”), claiming that Dynamic has failed to compensate Stavaridis for services rendered as a broker. Specifically, Stavaridis claims breach of contract (Count I), breach of fiduciary duty (Count II), violation of G.L.c. 93A, §11 (Counts III and IV), fraud (Count V), and quantum meruit (Count VI).

Dynamic now moves for summary judgment on all counts, and for the reasons outlined below, Dynamic’s motion is ALLOWED.

UNDISPUTED FACTS

The material undisputed facts are as…