Legal Opinion
Arrow Employment Agency, Inc. v. Tom Rice Buick-Pontiac-GMC Truck Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 17, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment unanimously modified by increasing the amount of the award to $2,015, and, as so modified, affirmed without costs.
Appeal from decision unanimously dismissed.
In order to establish entitlement to recover employment agency fees, the case law has “insisted upon * * * a request by an employer to an agency for referrals; that the Agency, in response to the request, make suitable referrals; that the employer hire an applicant sent by the Agency; that there be an agreement as to fee arrangements” (Robert Half of N. Y. v Levine-Baratto Assocs., 126 Misc 2d 169,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- John William Costello Associates, Inc. v. Standard Metals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Robert Half Personnel Agencies, Inc. v. Certified Management Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
- Robert Half v. Levine-Baratto Associates, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Hunt Personnel, Ltd. v. Hemingway Transport, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1980
- Macro Group, Inc. v. Swiss Re Life Co. AmericaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Koren Rogers Associates Inc. v. Standard Microsystems Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Career Blazers Inc. v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
- Career Blazers of White Plains Inc. v. Northern Homefunding Corp.White Plains City Court · 2003
- Koren Rogers Associates Inc. v. Standard Microsystems Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010