Legal Opinion

People v. Humphrey

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1996No. S045985PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

The Legislature has decreed that, when relevant, expert testimony regarding “battered women’s syndrome” is generally admissible in a criminal action. (Evid. Code, § 1107.) We must determine the purposes for which a jury may consider this evidence when offered to support a claim of self-defense to a murder charge.

The trial court instructed that the jury could consider the evidence in deciding whether the defendant actually believed it was necessary to kill in self-defense, but not in deciding whether that belief was reasonable. The instruction was erroneous. Because evidence of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. People v. StitelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. RiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. MichaelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API