People v. Humphrey
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
The Legislature has decreed that, when relevant, expert testimony regarding “battered women’s syndrome” is generally admissible in a criminal action. (Evid. Code, § 1107.) We must determine the purposes for which a jury may consider this evidence when offered to support a claim of self-defense to a murder charge.
The trial court instructed that the jury could consider the evidence in deciding whether the defendant actually believed it was necessary to kill in self-defense, but not in deciding whether that belief was reasonable. The instruction was erroneous. Because evidence of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. KellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by168 opinions
- People v. StitelyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. RiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MichaelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.