Laloli v. C R Bard Incorporated

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANCIS LALOLI, Case No. 19-cv-05679-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS IN LIMINE 9 v. 10 C.R. BARD, INC., et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 The Court now rules as follows regarding the parties’ motions in limine: 14 I. Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine No. 1 (ECF No. 156) 15 A. Motion To Preclude “Any Suggestion that Mr. Laloli’s Eclipse Filter Caught or Stopped a Clot and Saved His Life” 16 This motion is granted. Dr. Stein may not suggest that Laloli’s filter “accomplished its 17 mission” by stopping or dissolving a…