Legal Opinion
Hines v. Davidowitz
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 1941No. 22PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
312 U.S. 52 (1941)
HINES, SECRETARY OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
v.
DAVIDOWITZ ET AL.
No. 22.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued December 10, 11, 1940.
Decided January 20, 1941.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Mrs. M. Louise Rutherford and Mr. William S. Rial, Deputy Attorneys General of Pennsylvania, with whom Mr. Claude T. Reno, Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Isidor Ostroff, with whom Mr. Herman Steerman was on the brief, for appellees.
2Opinion of the Court · BlackJustice Black
This case involves the validity of an Alien Registration Act…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited47 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Michiko Gingery v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Epcon Communities Franchising, L.L.C. v. Wilcox Dev. Group, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
- Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015