Legal Opinion

Transue v. Gregorashczuk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 12, 1929No. Appeal, 113PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an appeal from the continuance of a preliminary injunction; such an order is not appealable: Holden v. Llewellyn, 262 Pa. 400, 403. Moreover, appellant did not comply with Rule 58 of our court as to obtaining a memorandum opinion from the court below stating reasons for the rulings complained of, which rule expressly provides that a failure to comply with it “may be considered as a waiver of all objections to the rulings, order, judgment or decree in question”; and this case impresses us as one to which the rule should be applied. Finally, if, despite the fact that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Holden v. LlewellynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Roth v. Columbia Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Solar Electric Co. v. Brookville Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Conrad v. StahlmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API