Transue v. Gregorashczuk
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is an appeal from the continuance of a preliminary injunction; such an order is not appealable: Holden v. Llewellyn, 262 Pa. 400, 403. Moreover, appellant did not comply with Rule 58 of our court as to obtaining a memorandum opinion from the court below stating reasons for the rulings complained of, which rule expressly provides that a failure to comply with it “may be considered as a waiver of all objections to the rulings, order, judgment or decree in question”; and this case impresses us as one to which the rule should be applied. Finally, if, despite the fact that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Holden v. LlewellynSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Roth v. Columbia Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Solar Electric Co. v. Brookville Boro.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Conrad v. StahlmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929